The Mutual Submission Myth: How the Church Neutered Men

Jim Hall • July 28, 2025

The Mutual Submission Myth: How the Church Neutered Men

The Errors of “Mutual Submission”:


A Lie Wrapped in Churchy Language

You’ve heard it before. Probably from a soft-spoken pastor trying to make Ephesians 5 sound less offensive to modern ears:
“Marriage is all about mutual submission.”

It sounds sweet.
It sounds balanced.
It sounds like it might keep the peace in your pews.

But it’s not biblical.

It’s not just a harmless misinterpretation—it’s a direct assault on God’s established order for the home, for marriage, and for gender roles. It’s compromise dressed up in scriptural language, and it’s time men started calling it what it is: a counterfeit.

Here’s why this feel-good teaching crumbles under the weight of truth:

 


1. Ephesians 5 Doesn’t Teach It—At All

The mutual submission argument always starts with this verse:

“Submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.” – Ephesians 5:21

Sounds mutual, right? But you can’t stop reading there.

The very next verse says:

“Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord.” – Ephesians 5:22

So what gives?

๐Ÿ” Understanding the Difference Between v. 21 and v. 22

Verse 21 wraps up Paul’s instructions on Spirit-filled Christian living (vv. 18–21). It’s a general call for believers to walk in humility toward one another. It reflects the attitude of Christ—where we seek others' good, consider others before ourselves, and maintain unity in the body.

But in verse 22, Paul pivots into specific instructions for how God’s order is to be lived out in the home. And here’s what’s critical:
In Greek, the word “submit” isn’t even repeated in verse 22—it’s implied directly from verse 21. That grammatical structure tells us that Paul is not continuing a “mutual submission” idea—he’s beginning a new section with specific roles.

From verse 22 forward, he lays out three structured, hierarchical relationships:

  • Wives to husbands
  • Children to parents
  • Slaves to masters

These are all asymmetrical, non-reciprocal relationships.
You don’t see Paul telling husbands to submit to wives, parents to obey children, or masters to yield to slaves.

So when modern pastors try to use verse 21 to erase verse 22, they’re not doing exegesis—they’re doing theological gymnastics to appease the culture.

Paul’s flow is clear:
General humility → Specific order
Mutual attitude → Distinct roles

 


2. Leadership and Submission Are Not Reciprocal

Submission, by nature, is directional.
If everyone’s in charge, nobody is.
If everyone is submitting, nobody is leading.

That’s not unity—it’s chaos.

And God is not the author of confusion (1 Cor. 14:33).
He is the architect of order.

Leadership in the home isn’t a joint effort. It’s not a board meeting.
It’s a mantle of responsibility placed squarely on the husband’s shoulders by God Himself.

The man leads.
The wife follows.
That’s not oppressive—it’s beautiful when done God’s way.

 


3. Christ’s Relationship with the Church Isn’t “Mutual”

Paul grounds his teaching in the model of Christ and the Church:

“Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church…”, "…as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.” – Eph. 5:25, 24


Here’s a sobering question:
Does Christ ever submit to the Church?
Does the Church ever direct, instruct, or lead Christ?

Of course not. That would be heresy.

If mutual submission were truly biblical, then Christ would be taking His marching orders from us.
But the Gospel doesn’t work that way—and neither does marriage.

Christ leads. The Church follows.
The husband leads. The wife follows.
This is the order that glorifies God and brings peace to the home.

 


4. “Mutual Submission” Undermines Male Headship

Scripture doesn’t just allow male headship—it demands it.

“The husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church.” – Eph. 5:23

Paul doesn’t say the husband should be the head.
He doesn’t say it’s a cultural accommodation.
He declares it as divine truth.

Now ask yourself:
If husband and wife are submitting to each other equally in all things…
What exactly does “headship” mean anymore?

It becomes nothing more than a title without teeth.
But biblical headship is not symbolic—it’s
functional, active, and accountable.
Mutual submission, if taken literally,
erases that role entirely.

 


5. It’s a Doctrine Built to Appease Feminism, Not Honor God

Let’s stop pretending this came from deep biblical study.
It didn’t. It came from cultural pressure.

Pastors didn’t suddenly uncover “mutual submission” in the Greek—they borrowed it from secular feminism and gave it a churchy label.

This isn’t a move toward truth.
It’s a retreat from it.

“Mutual submission” is a theological sedative for the modern church. It keeps the peace, keeps the tithes flowing, and keeps the feminists happy.

But what it doesn’t do is build strong men, strong marriages, or strong homes.

And it doesn’t glorify God.

 


6. Scripture Commands Wives to Submit—Not Husbands

This one’s easy. Search your Bible.

Not once will you find a verse that tells husbands to submit to their wives.
But here’s what you will find:

  • Love her sacrificially (Eph. 5:25)
  • Lead your home well (1 Tim. 3:4)
  • Be the head (1 Cor. 11:3)
  • Dwell with understanding (1 Pet. 3:7)
  • Provide for your family (1 Tim. 5:8)

All of those are heavy, masculine responsibilities.
But
none of them are submission. And that matters.

Because leadership is not about being served—it’s about serving first.
But
it is still leadership. And it’s not optional.

 


๐Ÿงจ Bottom Line: Obedience Isn’t “Mutual”

This isn’t about control.
It’s not about ego.
It’s about
God’s order—and whether we will obey it or rewrite it.

God gave men the mantle of headship.
Not to dominate. Not to be tyrants.
But to lead in sacrifice, vision, provision, and protection.

And He gave wives the role of submission.
Not as lesser beings, but as strong, godly women operating within the framework of divine order.

“Mutual submission” sounds soft, spiritual, and sensitive.
But what it really does is rob men of their God-given authority and saddle women with burdens they were never built to carry.

It’s time for men to wake up, rise up, and take back their role.
Not for pride—but for obedience.

 


โš ๏ธ Challenge for Men:

Are you leading your home with conviction?
Or are you letting the church neuter your God-given role?
Are you stepping forward with courage, or stepping back in fear of offending someone?

Enough is enough.
Lead. Love. Guide. Protect.
Be the man God called you to be.

And stop apologizing for obeying His Word.


By Jim Hall August 29, 2025
If I had it to do over again
By Jim Hall May 13, 2025
Like it or not, you're the boss!
By Jim Hall May 6, 2025
Why Masculine Worship Matters: A Call for Men to Lead
By Jim Hall May 2, 2025
Cowards in the Pulpit: When Culture Trumps Courage